<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Strategic Communications</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.stratcommunications.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.stratcommunications.com</link>
	<description>Practical strategies for better communication results</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 14:43:42 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5</generator>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Is Social Media Advertising or PR? &#8211; Duh! by LeadGenix</title>
		<link>http://blog.stratcommunications.com/is-social-media-advertising-or-pr-duh/comment-page-1/#comment-2086</link>
		<dc:creator>LeadGenix</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 14 May 2013 14:43:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stratcommunications.com/?p=2361#comment-2086</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[While social media may not always be paid advertising, this article is exactly right in that it should still drive toward results.  A lot of times social media can create goodwill, but the end goal of the goodwill is still to effect the bottom line.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While social media may not always be paid advertising, this article is exactly right in that it should still drive toward results.  A lot of times social media can create goodwill, but the end goal of the goodwill is still to effect the bottom line.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Three C’s to Cementing Your Brand in the Minds of Your Market: Coca-Cola Style by lpophal</title>
		<link>http://blog.stratcommunications.com/the-three-cs-to-cementing-your-brand-in-the-minds-of-your-market-coca-cola-style/comment-page-1/#comment-2015</link>
		<dc:creator>lpophal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:53:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stratcommunications.com/?p=1994#comment-2015</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, good point - in fact, I think smaller companies can have an edge here, especially if their markets are well defined and &quot;close to home.&quot; Far easier to form relationships based on real face-to-face connections. A recent good book that really makes this point well is &quot;The Face to Face Book: Why Real Relationships Rule in a Digital World,&quot; by Ed Keller and Brad Fay.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, good point &#8211; in fact, I think smaller companies can have an edge here, especially if their markets are well defined and &#8220;close to home.&#8221; Far easier to form relationships based on real face-to-face connections. A recent good book that really makes this point well is &#8220;The Face to Face Book: Why Real Relationships Rule in a Digital World,&#8221; by Ed Keller and Brad Fay.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on The Three C’s to Cementing Your Brand in the Minds of Your Market: Coca-Cola Style by Vanessa</title>
		<link>http://blog.stratcommunications.com/the-three-cs-to-cementing-your-brand-in-the-minds-of-your-market-coca-cola-style/comment-page-1/#comment-2014</link>
		<dc:creator>Vanessa</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 13:18:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stratcommunications.com/?p=1994#comment-2014</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Using corporate social responsibility alongside branding is genius. And Coca-Cola definitely knows how to play it well. But you do not have to be as big as Coca-Cola to be creative with your branding. Even your social responsibility goals need not be as grand as saving the polar bears. Small business marketing can be simple yet effective. And the &quot;social responsibility + branding&quot; formula can be a good start.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Using corporate social responsibility alongside branding is genius. And Coca-Cola definitely knows how to play it well. But you do not have to be as big as Coca-Cola to be creative with your branding. Even your social responsibility goals need not be as grand as saving the polar bears. Small business marketing can be simple yet effective. And the &#8220;social responsibility + branding&#8221; formula can be a good start.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Small Businesses Avoiding LinkedIn, Google+ and Pinterest: Are They Missing Out? by Wizard Tech Consulting</title>
		<link>http://blog.stratcommunications.com/small-businesses-avoiding-linkedin-google-and-pinterest-are-they-missing-out/comment-page-1/#comment-2013</link>
		<dc:creator>Wizard Tech Consulting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Jan 2013 02:18:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stratcommunications.com/?p=1618#comment-2013</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The use of social media for small business marketing depends on needs. Basing from experience with our clients, Facebook and Twitter work for businesses that sell products and would love to engage with their customers. We find LinkedIn useful for engagement with clients who are professionals and experts in the field.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of social media for small business marketing depends on needs. Basing from experience with our clients, Facebook and Twitter work for businesses that sell products and would love to engage with their customers. We find LinkedIn useful for engagement with clients who are professionals and experts in the field.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Which Department &#8220;Owns&#8221; Social Media? by Vicki Hoehn</title>
		<link>http://blog.stratcommunications.com/what-department-owns-social-media/comment-page-1/#comment-1277</link>
		<dc:creator>Vicki Hoehn</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Nov 2010 13:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stratcommunications.com/?p=797#comment-1277</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Great article Linda!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Great article Linda!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on If You Can&#8217;t Be Found Online, Are You &#8220;For Real&#8221;? by Digett</title>
		<link>http://blog.stratcommunications.com/if-you-cant-be-found-online-are-you-for-real/comment-page-1/#comment-1276</link>
		<dc:creator>Digett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Nov 2010 17:02:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stratcommunications.com/?p=804#comment-1276</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I ran into this problem just yesterday, actually. I needed to find some basic information about a third party company to put into a basic bio on a clients&#039; website.

A search for the business itself turned up no website, and a search for the owner turned up a bare bones LinkedIn profile and no solid information.

Perhaps the business is new. But if their main business is supposedly ecommerce...how are their customers finding them? 

It used to be suspicious if a word you heard couldn&#039;t be found in the dictionary -- generally that meant that it wasn&#039;t real, and couldn&#039;t be trusted. Maybe the same is becoming true with not being found online.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I ran into this problem just yesterday, actually. I needed to find some basic information about a third party company to put into a basic bio on a clients&#8217; website.</p>
<p>A search for the business itself turned up no website, and a search for the owner turned up a bare bones LinkedIn profile and no solid information.</p>
<p>Perhaps the business is new. But if their main business is supposedly ecommerce&#8230;how are their customers finding them? </p>
<p>It used to be suspicious if a word you heard couldn&#8217;t be found in the dictionary &#8212; generally that meant that it wasn&#8217;t real, and couldn&#8217;t be trusted. Maybe the same is becoming true with not being found online.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Makes Information Worth Paying For? An &#8220;Aha!&#8221; Moment! by lpophal</title>
		<link>http://blog.stratcommunications.com/what-makes-information-worth-paying-for-an-aha-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-1275</link>
		<dc:creator>lpophal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Nov 2010 21:42:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stratcommunications.com/?p=779#comment-1275</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Good points. There definitely needs to be something about the content that makes it not only preferred but valued enough that consumers don&#039;t feel they can get it elsewhere at no cost.

When I work with clients, though, I&#039;m always a little &quot;worried&quot; when their business model requires too much educating of consumers about why they should want what the business has to sell. Comments like &quot;then (the customer) don&#039;t understand our value proposition&quot; seems to me like code for &quot;we (the business owners) don&#039;t understand what&#039;s important to our market.&quot;

I realize that there are times when businesses do need to educate consumers, particularly with new and innovative products/services that clients may not yet be familiar with. But, generally I think businesses are more effective and need to invest less time, effort and angst if they can identify unmet needs and then fill them. It&#039;s the &quot;old school&quot; approach, but I think it still works. And, I think content delivery models can take the same approach. 

What unmet needs for information exist that represent some form of tangible value to the consumer (meaning that the same type of content is not readily available elsewhere at less--or no--cost)? There are some people out there who are still quite successful at selling content--there are thousands (millions?) more, though, that are struggling to come up with the &quot;magic formula.&quot; Too often, I&#039;m afraid, they think that formula relies more on their marketing efforts than the nature of the content they have to offer in the first place!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points. There definitely needs to be something about the content that makes it not only preferred but valued enough that consumers don&#8217;t feel they can get it elsewhere at no cost.</p>
<p>When I work with clients, though, I&#8217;m always a little &#8220;worried&#8221; when their business model requires too much educating of consumers about why they should want what the business has to sell. Comments like &#8220;then (the customer) don&#8217;t understand our value proposition&#8221; seems to me like code for &#8220;we (the business owners) don&#8217;t understand what&#8217;s important to our market.&#8221;</p>
<p>I realize that there are times when businesses do need to educate consumers, particularly with new and innovative products/services that clients may not yet be familiar with. But, generally I think businesses are more effective and need to invest less time, effort and angst if they can identify unmet needs and then fill them. It&#8217;s the &#8220;old school&#8221; approach, but I think it still works. And, I think content delivery models can take the same approach. </p>
<p>What unmet needs for information exist that represent some form of tangible value to the consumer (meaning that the same type of content is not readily available elsewhere at less&#8211;or no&#8211;cost)? There are some people out there who are still quite successful at selling content&#8211;there are thousands (millions?) more, though, that are struggling to come up with the &#8220;magic formula.&#8221; Too often, I&#8217;m afraid, they think that formula relies more on their marketing efforts than the nature of the content they have to offer in the first place!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on What Makes Information Worth Paying For? An &#8220;Aha!&#8221; Moment! by Erin</title>
		<link>http://blog.stratcommunications.com/what-makes-information-worth-paying-for-an-aha-moment/comment-page-1/#comment-1274</link>
		<dc:creator>Erin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Nov 2010 18:35:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stratcommunications.com/?p=779#comment-1274</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In my mind, it&#039;s about educating your customers/clients on how to be &quot;better buyers of your product&quot;. I don&#039;t think that most customers will pay for content (whether in money or an email address), because there are so many similar resources out there that are free. The exception would be if the content is exclusive, hard-to-find, or highly sought after. If that content is helping them make better decisions and become more knowledgeable or more aware, you have a better chance that they&#039;ll buy it from you instead of your competitor. 

Which is another point - does the success of a content marketing strategy depend on what stage the customer is at? If they don&#039;t know they need your product, will content marketing help to &#039;push&#039; that message? Versus...if they are looking specifically for your product and comparing (inbound, or &#039;pull&#039;), will content marketing make you the preferred choice among competitors? Just a thought...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In my mind, it&#8217;s about educating your customers/clients on how to be &#8220;better buyers of your product&#8221;. I don&#8217;t think that most customers will pay for content (whether in money or an email address), because there are so many similar resources out there that are free. The exception would be if the content is exclusive, hard-to-find, or highly sought after. If that content is helping them make better decisions and become more knowledgeable or more aware, you have a better chance that they&#8217;ll buy it from you instead of your competitor. </p>
<p>Which is another point &#8211; does the success of a content marketing strategy depend on what stage the customer is at? If they don&#8217;t know they need your product, will content marketing help to &#8216;push&#8217; that message? Versus&#8230;if they are looking specifically for your product and comparing (inbound, or &#8216;pull&#8217;), will content marketing make you the preferred choice among competitors? Just a thought&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sometimes &#8220;Snail Mail&#8221; is Still the Best Way to Go by lpophal</title>
		<link>http://blog.stratcommunications.com/sometimes-snail-mail-is-the-only-way-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-1272</link>
		<dc:creator>lpophal</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 12:41:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stratcommunications.com/?p=768#comment-1272</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Security is definitely becoming an issue and, you&#039;re right, may play a major role in how effective online communication continues to be. Communicators definitely have to stay on their toes these days! More options mean more opportunities--but more choices and potentially more work. And the landscape is always changing. Exciting times!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Security is definitely becoming an issue and, you&#8217;re right, may play a major role in how effective online communication continues to be. Communicators definitely have to stay on their toes these days! More options mean more opportunities&#8211;but more choices and potentially more work. And the landscape is always changing. Exciting times!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Sometimes &#8220;Snail Mail&#8221; is Still the Best Way to Go by Garrett Denney</title>
		<link>http://blog.stratcommunications.com/sometimes-snail-mail-is-the-only-way-to-go/comment-page-1/#comment-1271</link>
		<dc:creator>Garrett Denney</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Oct 2010 04:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.stratcommunications.com/?p=768#comment-1271</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That 73% took the step to play the discs was astonishing. I would not have guessed anywhere near that!

Perhaps my own tendancy to ruthlessly filter mail is showing here. (Was anyone else shocked by that stat?)

On the flipside, it is interesting to see that only 59% thought the discs more secure than an email. In the university setting email security is becoming a problem. Too much spam, too much junk mail. It is breeding a new generation of email users who aren&#039;t afraid to hit that delete button without a second though.

Interesting post!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That 73% took the step to play the discs was astonishing. I would not have guessed anywhere near that!</p>
<p>Perhaps my own tendancy to ruthlessly filter mail is showing here. (Was anyone else shocked by that stat?)</p>
<p>On the flipside, it is interesting to see that only 59% thought the discs more secure than an email. In the university setting email security is becoming a problem. Too much spam, too much junk mail. It is breeding a new generation of email users who aren&#8217;t afraid to hit that delete button without a second though.</p>
<p>Interesting post!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
